

Page 1 of 3 | ||
Page 1 of 3 |
3 comments |
2021 Toyota Camry TRD Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh Other manufacturers have been replacing V6 engines with turbocharged fours and conventional automatics with CVTS and automated dual-clutch manual transmissions (DCTs) to improve fuel economy. With EPA ratings of 22 city and 31 highway, the Camry TRD trails the Honda Accord Sport 2.0T (with a ten-speed rather than an eight-speed... Comparison vehicle: 2016 Nissan Maxima |
6 comments |
2018 Honda Accord Sport Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh Back in the 1970s and 1980s, many people initially bought a Honda for fuel efficiency. In my suburban driving with the latest Accord, I often observed trip computer averages in the upper 30s. In two drives the averages topped 40 mpg, a highly impressive figure for a car with the... Comparison vehicle: 2018 Toyota Camry |
2000 Subaru Outback Pros and Cons A member in British Columbia, Canada Fuel economy is as expected, not great. It's a heavy car with an old engine and AWD. Short trips in the city, and it's fairly horrible. On the highway, it's particularly sensitive to speed, as the car is not very aerodynamic. I got as bad as 16 l/100 Km in... Comparison vehicle: 2003 Toyota Camry |
|
2 comments |
2016 Hyundai Sonata Hybrid Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh Why isn't fuel economy among the why-to-buys for the new Sonata Hybrid? Well, while fuel economy is certainly very good, it's not as good as that of the Toyota Camry or Honda Accord. The Ford Fusion Hybrid might also have an edge. In the EPA's tests, the Hyundai... Comparison vehicle: 2015 Toyota Camry |
2015 Toyota Camry Hybrid SE Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh The SE's grippier tires knock the Toyota Camry Hybrid's EPA ratings down from 43/39 to 40/38. The Ford Fusion Hybrid tests better, 44/41, while the Honda Accord Hybrid tests far better, 50/45. Then there's the real world, where, according to the cars' trip computers, my suburban average was in... Comparison vehicle: 2013 Ford Fusion |
|
Looking to trade in your vehicle? Get an estimate of how much it's worth.
| |
A SOUND HANDLING 2012 Toyota Camry Pros and Cons Member3383 Highway economy: 40mpg<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> City economy: 25 mpg<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> My average: 29.3 mpg |
|
A roomy frugal hybrid 2012 Toyota Camry Pros and Cons A member in Nebraska, United States The car is returning 46 mpg in town and 40 on hi-way trips. High Speed (65-70 mph)trips return 36 mpg. And that is with air conditioning. |
|
2002 Toyota Camry Pros and Cons Member5699 Average 22 to 25 miles per gallon |
|
Camry longevity reputation for high mileage. 2012 Toyota Camry Pros and Cons Member5648 After 6000 miles the car averages around 24 mpg city and 27.4 mpg highway. The latest response from the dealer is the milage will improve after I have driven 12,000 miles . That is the fourth milestone i have been told to reach for better fuel economy. The... |
|
2008 Toyota Camry Pros and Cons Member5584 Gets great fuel mileage; when you watch your acceleration and keep cruise control at 65-70 its fairly easy to get 40mpg. |
|
2009 Toyota Camry Pros and Cons Member3007 I have an overall average of 28.5 mpg for the 78,000 miles I have driven this car, mostly on long trips. 30 MPG average is common on highways under 65 mph, and 26-28 is more the norm during 75 MPH interstate driving. 24-26 is common in suburban driving |
|
| |
2012 Volkswagen Passat TDI SEL Premium Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh The 2012 Volkswagen Passat is offered with three engines: a 170-horsepower 2.5-liter five-cylinder, a 280-horsepower 3.6-liter V6, and a 140-horsepower four-cylinder turbodiesel. The first gets the job done, and the second performs at least as well as competitors' V6s, but the third is something that no one else offers in... Comparison vehicle: 2012 Toyota Camry |
|
2005 Toyota Camry Pros and Cons A member in Mississippi, United States |
|
2012 Toyota Camry Pros and Cons Member1246 There is a bug in this SW, it removed ALL my "like" comments!! Will redo best can remember for my XLE 4 cyl w/leather/conv pkg/entune. Measured actual mpg 33 in mixed hwy/city driving first tank 210 miles. Got 40mpg best case 70mph 40 mi no wind |
|
2012 Toyota Camry Pros and Cons Member4297 gas won.t stay where it is. A 40% increase in mpg will pay off in less than 6 years |
|
2012 Toyota Camry Pros and Cons Member4297 gas won.t stay where it is. A 40% increase in mpg will pay off in less than 6 years |
|
2010 Toyota Camry Pros and Cons A member in New Hampshire, United States 34mpg on regular |
|
2002 Toyota Camry Pros and Cons Member5342 I consistantly get 10L/100Km performance on average. |
|
2002 Toyota Camry Pros and Cons A member in Georgia, United States Consistently get 25 average mpg. 20 in city and 33 in strictly highway. |
|
2008 Toyota Camry Pros and Cons Member4916 very good |
|
2004 Toyota Camry Pros and Cons A member in Maine, United States Consistently maintains a blend of 30 mpg |
|
2007 Toyota Camry Pros and Cons Member4984 |
|
2011 Toyota Camry Pros and Cons Member3222 First tank of gas yielded 28.75 MPG--not bad considering mix of city and rural with no long constant cruise. Also ambient temperature was from 5-20 degrees. |
|
2011 Toyota Camry Pros and Cons Member3222 First tank of gas yielded 28.75 MPG! This was a mix of city and highway driving while varying speeds during break in so there was never much of a constant speed. Made no attempt to maximize economy. |
|
2000 Toyota Camry Pros and Cons Member4787 with the 3.0L v6 i average 22/23 under all driving conditions with ac on. city 22 hwy 26 or better. plenty of power for average driver. |