

Page 1 of 2 | ||
Page 1 of 2 |
1 comment |
2019 Toyota RAV4 Hybrid Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh Toyota improved the RAV4 Hybrid's fuel economy dramatically with the redesign. The model's EPA highway rating has surged from 30 to 38 mpg, while its city rating has jumped from 34 to 41 mpg. In suburban driving I easily achieved trip computer averages in the low 40s, with a max... Comparison vehicle: 2019 Subaru Forester |
2 comments |
2014 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons gserink Fuel econmy is OK in summer, again would be good vehicle for california. However in Canada where we get lots of cold weather fuel economy is very poor, in fact it is worse than my BMW, which has twice the horsepower and my Honda Van, what gives? Plus you are... |
Nice, not exactly buyers remorse, but probably not up to scratch. 2014 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons A member in Georgia, United States 26.4 mpg isn't exactly the best ever, but for a very quick family car, it is hard to top. |
|
2 comments |
2015 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons Ericerau I drive mainly around town and average 26 overall. On a highway drive, I get around 33. My previous vehicle was a 2009 Escape V6 AWD, this is a definite improvement on fuel economy. I could rarely get 30 on the highway. Typically around 27. |
1 comment |
Good, practical car, but few flaws for enthusiasts 2014 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons Member3137 Gas mileage is excellent for a full-time AWD car. I averaged 27 in mixe driving. |
Looking to trade in your vehicle? Get an estimate of how much it's worth.
| |
7 comments |
2014 Nissan Rogue Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh Though more fuel-efficient than heavier, truck-based SUVs, crossovers have remained much less fuel-efficient than lower, lighter, more aerodynamic cars. Especially if they are equipped with all-wheel-drive (AWD), which adds weight and drivetrain friction. Still, their efficiency has been improving. With EPA ratings of 25 mpg city, 32 mpg... Comparison vehicle: 2014 Subaru Forester |
3 comments |
2014 Subaru Forester 2.5i Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh Subaru's latest engines when paired with a continuously variable transmission (CVT) earn much better EPA numbers than their ancestors. The 2013 Forester rated only 20 mpg city, 26 mpg highway. The 2014 checks in at 24/32, about as good as you'll find in a compact crossover with all-wheel-drive. The CR-V... Comparison vehicle: 2013 Honda CR-V |
Subaru reliability? 2011 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons Member5919 I've been getting higher than expected fuel economy - around 28MPG, mostly highway |
|
2 comments |
AWESOME small/mid-size SUV choice - the BEST! 2014 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons LMCRM The suggested/promised MPG is pretty high and, while I haven't hit those numbers on average, I can say that I'm getting better mileage than I was getting in a smaller, non-AWD, non-SUV "sporty" car with a smaller engine. The built-in value of the vehicle is top notch... For the price,... |
2 comments |
AWESOME small/mid-size SUV choice - the BEST! 2014 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons LMCRM The suggested/promised MPG is pretty high and, while I haven't hit those numbers on average, I can say that I'm getting better mileage than I was getting in a smaller, non-AWD, non-SUV "sporty" car with a smaller engine. The built-in value of the vehicle is top notch... For the price,... |
2004 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons Member5793 Fuel economy is hit or miss. I've seen anywhere from 14-20 in the city with no discernable difference in driving habits. On the highway I've seen anywhere from 19-26. Once again, with no discernable difference in driving style, speed, or weather. There is just no predictability. |
|
| |
Excellent compromise on-off road 2009 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons Member5609 Fuel consumption in 63000Km: -city: on the average(rush hours and non rush hours) around 15l/100Km -highway: around 9-10l/100Km at 130Km/h, 18-20l/100Km at 200-210 Km/h - other paved roads including mountain paved roads: around 11-12l/100Km - off-road: 14-16l/100Km |
|
Loving the XT 2006 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons Member5610 Some people look at the XT's ratings and think 19-24 is horrible AND you have to buy premium gas! Not me. Don't mind it one bit. Do the math: $3 extra over regular unleaded at the pump every fill-up, 4 times a month (although I fill up less), that's... |
|
2011 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons A member in Michigan, United States Mileage is sub par. This Forester replaced a 2007 Ford Fusion all wheel drive. Same driving style, same route, same traffic- 2 mpg less than the V6 Fusion. |
|
2010 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons A member in Georgia, United States fuel milage around town is averaging 24 miles to the gallon, but it is still new and not being loaded. |
|
2004 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons Member4380 |
|
2004 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons A member in Quebec, Canada Takes a lot of fuel and also require Super. Youve got to pay to play. |
|
2010 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons Member3243 Handling is so pleasant that sporty driving is quite fule consuming |
|
2005 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons Member860 Considering it was an AWD car, I expected something worse than our Protege5, but it was not far off. |
|
2009 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons A member in Michigan, United States |
|
2009 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons Member2859 So far, so very good. Much better than my Element. Avg. 25 city. |
|
2009 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons Member2592 Good fuel economy for a relatively large vehicle |
|
2008 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons Member2530 Much better than expected -- averaging about 28 mpg, which is awesome for a small SUV. |
|
2008 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons Member2431 |
|
2009 Subaru Forester Pros and Cons Member2366 Saves over 40% compared to last SUV |