

Page 1 of 1 | ||
Page 1 of 1 |
4 comments |
2015 Nissan Murano Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh Within today's Nissan, fuel economy seems a far higher priority than performance. The Murano's base engine remains a naturally aspirated, port-injected 3.5-liter V6 good for 265 horsepower. In some applications Nissan's V6 can be thirsty. But in the Murano it's somehow efficient. Much credit is likely due the CVT (continuously... Comparison vehicle: 2015 Ford Edge |
Ladies car for sure! 2009 Nissan Murano Pros and Cons markh Good on gas, about 24 mpg on the highway. |
|
2010 Nissan Murano Pros and Cons Member796 Good fuel economy for an SUV and has powerful engine. |
|
2003 Nissan Murano Pros and Cons Member4639 Saved me a ton of money in gas and insurance |
|
2006 Nissan Murano Pros and Cons Member4535 The In car Computer Tells me that It Averages over 30 MPG on the Highway, and over 22 in the city, the range is just under 600km on 89 octane fuel. |
|
Looking to trade in your vehicle? Get an estimate of how much it's worth.
| |
2003 Nissan Murano Pros and Cons Member4532 since day one. I did the calculation about the Fuel Economy and it never went over 16MPG. the computer on board is not correct when it tells you 21 or 23 MPG I drove this car since it has 5 miles till now which is almost 100,000 Miles. Fuel Economy 15MPG |
|
2003 Nissan Murano Pros and Cons REDACTED Good due to CVT transmission in balance with its HP. |
|
2009 Nissan Murano Pros and Cons A member in Texas, United States My average is well above the EPA estimate of 19- mine is closer to 24-25, with combo city and highway driving. Once at a steady speed, the MPGs hover at 27-33 at both 40mph and 75 mph |
|
2009 Nissan Murano Pros and Cons A member in Texas, United States Once at a constant speed, the MPG hovers between 27-32- much better then the EPA estimates. My average MPG with combined city and highway driving is 24- 5MPG better than the EPA tests. |
|
2009 Nissan Murano Pros and Cons A member in Texas, United States Once you are at a steady speed, the MPG climb to above 30mpg easily, whether at 30 MPH or 75MPH. My average mileage is above 24MPG- 5 MPG better than the EPA estimate |
|
2006 Nissan Murano Pros and Cons A member in Florida, United States I get 21 around town, and 25+ highway which I think is very good for a vehicle this size and weight. |
|
| |
2003 Nissan Murano Pros and Cons Member495 good for the size |
|
2004 Nissan Murano Pros and Cons Member2995 |
|
2009 Nissan Murano Pros and Cons Member2944 |
|
2009 Nissan Murano Pros and Cons Member2944 My previous vehicle was a Mazda Tribute which was a smaller SUV by comparison. Exact same type of driving got me about 17 mpg vs 21 mpg w/the Murano. I get better mileage than the EPA lists for the vehicle because I hypermile when I can. |
|
2009 Nissan Murano Pros and Cons A member in Ohio, United States Wish it was better with the CVT |
|
2005 Nissan Murano Pros and Cons A member in New York, United States Fuel economy is fine for me. I get 22-24mpg without the trailer, a light gas peddle foot, and under 70mph, But if you accelerate fast and drive fast without reguard to MPG you will easily slip into the 18mpg range. With trailer MPG is 13-15. |
|
2007 Nissan Murano Pros and Cons Member2540 |
|
2009 Nissan Murano Pros and Cons Rudeney Fuel economy in town has been below 16MPG. It’s not bad, but the lack of economy does not deliver exciting performance as it does with other similarly sized SUV’s that get comparable mileage. |
|
2006 Nissan Murano Pros and Cons A member in Illinois, United States |
|
2006 Nissan Murano Pros and Cons mpaisis For a midsize SUV is very good at 22-23MPG on the HWY. But still is not much, especially at $3.50 per gallon! |
|
2005 Nissan Murano Pros and Cons A member in California, United States |
|
2003 Nissan Murano Pros and Cons Member1808 if you are worried about fuel economy buy an economy car. i pay for the power. |
|
2007 Nissan Murano Pros and Cons Member1475 Excellent. |
|
2009 Nissan Murano Pros and Cons Member2035 Uses Premium gas |