Model Year | 2013 | 2020 | |
Model | GMC Terrain | Mazda CX-5 | |
Engine | 3.6L V6 DOHC-4v 301 hp@6500 272 lb-ft@4800 |
turbocharged 2.5L I4 DOHC-4v 250 hp@5000 320 lb-ft@2500 |
|
Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 112.5 in | 106.2 in | 6.3 in |
Length | 185.3 in | 179.1 in | 6.2 in |
Width | 72.8 in | 72.5 in | 0.3 in |
Height | 66.3 in | 65.3 in | 1 in |
Curb Weight | 4188 lb. | 3825 lb. | 363 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 18.8 gal. | 14.8 gal. | 4 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 39.8 in | 39.7 in | 0.1 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 55.7 in | 57.1 in | -1.4 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.1 in | 55.2 in | -0.1 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 41.2 in | 41.0 in | 0.2 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 39.2 in | 39.0 in | 0.2 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 55.3 in | 54.8 in | 0.5 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 51.3 in | 55.3 in | -4 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 39.9 in | 39.6 in | 0.3 in |
Total Legroom | 81.1 in (over 2 rows) | 80.6 in (over 2 rows) | 0.5 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 31.6 ft3 | 30.9 ft3 | 0.7 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 63.9 ft3 | 59.6 ft3 | 4.3 ft3 |
2013 GMC Terrain Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2013 | The GMC Terrain's long wheelbase also pays off with noticeably more rear seat leg room than in competitors. In fact, there's a little more combined legroom in the first two rows than in the far larger Yukon XL, and a few more inches than in the larger Acadia. Sound like enough space to fit a third row? Perhaps, but GM opted not to offer one. The Terrain is thoroughly compact in width. The larger GMCs remain much better options for transporting three adults in the back seat. They're also better for carrying cargo. The Terrain's cargo floor is long, but its also high and narrow, and the second-row seats don't fold flat. see full GMC Terrain review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 GMC Terrain.
2020 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2020 Mazda CX-5.