Toyota RAV4 vs. Suzuki Grand Vitara Reliability Comparisons
You won't find Toyota RAV4 or Suzuki Grand Vitara reliability information like this anywhere else. Actual repair frequencies, not just vague dots, to make it clear how much the Toyota RAV4 and the Suzuki Grand Vitara truly differ in reliability. These stats are promptly updated four times a year, to much more closely track Toyota RAV4 and Suzuki Grand Vitara reliability as the cars age. Others tell you how reliable the Toyota RAV4 and the Suzuki Grand Vitara were a year ago, when the cars were a year younger and had 12,000 fewer miles on them. Only TrueDelta tells you how reliable the Toyota RAV4 and the Suzuki Grand Vitara have been recently.
See Toyota RAV4 vs. Suzuki Grand Vitara price comparisonSee what people are saying about Toyota RAV4 reliability
More about the
Toyota RAV4
More about the
Suzuki Grand Vitara
Take the TrueDelta survey on your car and get free access to all of the data on this page. Click here to get started!
Toyota RAV4 Reliability through December 31, 2012
An asterisk (*) marks results based on small sample sizes.
General NotesModels and statistics marked with an asterisk (*) have very low sample sizes. These results, visible only to logged-in members, provide only a rough estimate of car reliability.Any result under 20 repair trips per 100 cars is likely a result of the small sample size, and should be expected to increase to 20 or so in future updates.
New models often start out with high repair rates, and then improve as the manufacturer identifies and addresses common problems. MethodologyOnly successfully completed repairs are currently included in the analysis. Routine maintenance, most wear items, recalls, and problems fixed with just a reflash or warning light reset are not included.
What People Are Saying about Reliability and the Toyota RAV4
blog comments powered by DisqusWhat Our Members Are Saying about Toyota RAV4 Reliability and Durability
| Reliability and Durability of the Toyota RAV4: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
I have had zero problems with the car. |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
Excellent long term reliablity |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV 179-horsepower 2.5L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
High ratings from every car review I have read. Very high resale value and see used ones all the time with 150k+ miles - I should be able to own this 10+ years. |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
Toyota reputation. |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
This vehicle has consistently rated high in all professional reviews, and in consumers reviews. I agree. |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 166-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
It goes without saying that everyone wants a reliable vehicle. I believe that Toyota is not alone in that objective, the other manufacteurs have caught up with them. |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
never owned toyota but based on reputation.I know several people who own toyotas and no dissapointmenta |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
Several of my family members have had Toyotas over the years with no majot issues. |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
See above |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
Low maintenance cost, few recalls, no issues at all no rattles or squeeks and Toyota dealer has been very fair |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
After trading in a car that was in the shop 6+ times a year, I wanted a vehicle with an above-average likelihood of reliability. This vehicle has so far lived up to reliability expectations. |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
Many, many hassle-free miles. Few repairs needed. |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
My Rav has never had any repair issues, with over 30.000 miles. |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 166-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
Utterly reliable so far. |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
Very hearty little vehicle; expect to own this one for 7+ years. |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
Now have 10,000 mi with no problems of any kind |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
Toyota is known for reliability and durability. My 2002 RAV4 performed without fail for 7 years. Not a single dollar was spent on repairs. |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 166-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
Not one repair yet. |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
Toyota - nuff said. |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
Toyota reliability |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
No problems at all in the two years I have owned it. |
| 2004 | 4dr SUV 161-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
Toyoyta... need I say more. 84000 miles and not one problem. |
| 2002 | 4dr SUV 148-horsepower 2.0L I4 5-speed manual AWD |
Few problems with repairs. Now have over 223,000 km on vehicle. |
| Reliability and Durability of the Toyota RAV4: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 269-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
Power steering failed within 3 months of new. 4 wheel drive actuator failed. |
What Our Members Are Saying about Suzuki Grand Vitara Reliability and Durability
None of our members have yet commented on the reliability and durability of the Suzuki Grand Vitara.
