Subaru Outback vs. Chevrolet Equinox Price Comparison


TrueDelta features the Internet's most balanced and thorough car price and
features comparison between the Subaru Outback and Chevrolet Equinox. Including:
- TrueDelta Car Value Comparison
- Price/Invoice Comparison
- Feature Comparison
- Specs Comparison
- What Our Members Are Saying
More about the
Subaru Outback
More about the
Chevrolet Equinox
Calculate Payments
Summary
|
For the Subaru Outback vs. Chevrolet Equinox price comparison, we have first equipped the cars with selected features. The specific options added are shown in the Outback vs. Equinox Price Comparison table. If you want to know how much the Outback and Equinox will cost with the features you specified, this is the table to check. In this case, the Chevrolet Equinox LT's price is $1,697 lower than the Subaru Outback 2.5 XT's price |
TrueDelta Value Comparison: Subaru Outback vs. Chevrolet Equinox
| Lowest Adjusted Price and Invoice: Chevrolet Equinox LT | |||
| TrueDelta Adjusted Price Difference: 1,697 | |||
| TrueDelta Adjusted Invoice Difference: 1,010 | |||
| Model Year | 2006 | 2012 | 2012 |
| Model | Outback | Equinox | Equinox |
| Trim | 2.5 XT | LT | LTZ |
| Body | 4dr Wagon | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV |
| Engine | 265hp H4 | 264hp V6 | 264hp V6 |
| Transmission | M5 | T6 | T6 |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | AWD |
| EPA Fuel Economy (city/highway) | 19/25 MPG | 17/24 MPG | 17/24 MPG |
| Audio (watts, speakers | 120, 6 | 250, 8 | 250, 8 |
| Tire (rear if not all the same) | 225/55-17 | 225/65-17 | 225/65-17 |
| Total Price | 32,172 | 33,000 | 34,550 |
| Adjustments for Features | 0 | -2,525 | -3,540 |
| Feature-Adjusted Total Price | 32,172 | 30,475 | 31,010 |
| Cost Above Minimum | 0 | 0 | 535 |
| Total Invoice | 29,769 | 31,142 | 32,670 |
| Adjustments for Features | 0 | -2,383 | -3,347 |
| Feature-Adjusted Total Invoice | 29,769 | 28,759 | 29,323 |
| Cost Above Minimum | 0 | 0 | 564 |
Invoice Comparison: Subaru Outback vs. Chevrolet Equinox
Price Comparison (MSRP): Subaru Outback vs. Chevrolet EquinoxThe sticker prices, before adjusting for remaining feature differences. Usually these are the numbers you will see on the window stickers.
Models in short supply often sell at or even above these prices.
Models in short supply often sell at or even above these prices.
| Lowest Total Price: Subaru Outback 2.5 XT | |||
| Difference: 828 | |||
| Lowest Total Invoice: Subaru Outback 2.5 XT | |||
| Difference: 1,373 | |||
| Model Year | 2006 | 2012 | 2012 |
| Model | Outback | Equinox | Equinox |
| Trim | 2.5 XT | LT | LTZ |
| Body | 4dr Wagon | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV |
| Base Price | 28,595 | 25,050 | 29,220 |
| Base Invoice | 26,641 | 23,798 | 27,759 |
| Auto-dimming rearview mirror | 183 | ||
| Limited Package | 2,400 | ||
| Class II trailer hitch | 369 | 355 | 355 |
| 2LT Equipment Group | 1,820 | ||
| AWD | 1,750 | 1,750 | |
| 3.0L V6 | 1,500 | 1,500 | |
| Sunroof | 900 | 900 | |
| Leather seating surfaces | 800 | ||
| Auto-dimming rearview mirror | 0 | ||
| Limited Package | 0 | ||
| Class II trailer hitch | 312 | ||
| 2LT Equipment Group | 1,729 | ||
| AWD | 1,662 | ||
| 3.0L V6 | 1,320 | ||
| Sunroof | 792 | ||
| Leather seating surfaces | 704 | ||
| Total options | 2,952 | 7,125 | 4,505 |
| Total options | 2,503 | 6,519 | 4,086 |
| Destination | 625 | 825 | 825 |
| Total Price | 32,172 | 33,000 | 34,550 |
| Total Invoice | 29,769 | 31,142 | 32,670 |
Features Comparison: Subaru Outback vs. Chevrolet Equinox
| Model Year | 2006 | 2012 | 2012 |
| Model | Outback | Equinox | Equinox |
| Trim | 2.5 XT | LT | LTZ |
| Body | 4dr Wagon | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV |
| Transmission and Drivetrain | |||
| 5-speed manual | $0 | ||
| 6-speed manually-shiftable automatic | $1100 | $1100 | |
| AWD | $1700 | $1700 | $1700 |
| Accessories | |||
| Power liftgate | $350 | ||
| Remote start | $150 | $150 | |
| Tilt steering wheel, manual | $150 | ||
| Tilt/telescoping steering wheel, manual | $250 | $250 | |
| Brakes, Airbags, and Other Safety | |||
| Brake assist | $50 | $50 | |
| Front seat active head restraints | $50 | ||
| Obstacle detection, rear | $300 | ||
| Rearview camera | $200 | $200 | |
| Rollover sensor | $100 | $100 | |
| Stability control | $400 | $400 | |
| Tire-pressure monitor | $75 | $75 | |
| Traction control | $100 | $100 | |
| Cargo Management | |||
| Cargo cover | $75 | $75 | |
| Cargo mat | $40 | $40 | |
| Roof rack | $300 | $300 | |
| Roof rails | $250 | ||
| Climate Control and Infotainment | |||
| Audio controls on steering wheel | $125 | $125 | |
| Aux input | $100 | $100 | |
| Bluetooth cell phone link | $100 | $100 | |
| CD changer, in-dash | $325 | ||
| CD player | $125 | $125 | |
| Dual-zone climate control | $125 | ||
| Interior air filter | $25 | ||
| MP3-compatible player | $50 | $50 | |
| Satellite radio | $200 | $200 | |
| Telematics service, such as OnStar, with navigation | $400 | $400 | |
| Wiper de-icer | $25 | ||
| Exterior | |||
| Bodyside cladding | $350 | ||
| Bodyside cladding (gray/black) | $250 | $250 | |
| Bright-finished exhaust tip(s) | $50 | $50 | |
| Deep-tinted rear windows | $275 | $275 | |
| Hood scoop | $100 | ||
| Laminated side glass | $300 | $300 | |
| Sunroof | $900 | $900 | |
| Sunroof, large | $1200 | ||
| Wheel-lip moldings | $75 | ||
| Instruments, Lights, and Mirrors | |||
| Automatic headlights | $125 | $125 | |
| Automatic-off headlights | $25 | ||
| Spotter mirrors | $40 | $40 | |
| Powertrain | |||
| Limited-slip rear differential | $275 | ||
| Seats and Interior Trim | |||
| Manual fore-aft adjuster, second row seats | $75 | $75 | |
| Manual lumbar adjuster, driver seat | $50 | ||
| Manual lumbar adjuster, passenger seat | $50 | ||
| Manual recliner, second row seats | $75 | $75 | |
| Memory system, driver seat | $200 | ||
| Power fore-aft adjuster, passenger seat | $100 | ||
| Power lumbar adjuster, driver seat | $100 | $100 | |
| Power recliner, passenger seat | $100 | ||
| Suspension, Wheels, and Tires | |||
| Alloy wheels | $350 | $350 | |
| Machined alloy wheels | $350 | ||
| Raised heavy-duty suspension | $0 | ||
| Total Value of Features | $5,490 | $8,015 | $9,030 |
| Value of Feature Adjustments | $0 | $2,525 | $3,540 |
| Value of Feature Adjustments | 0 | -2,383 | -3,347 |
Specifications Comparison: Subaru Outback vs. Chevrolet Equinox
| Model Year | 2006 | 2012 |
| Model | Outback | Equinox |
| Body | 4dr Wagon | 4dr SUV |
| Wheelbase | 105.1 in | 112.5 in |
| Length | 188.7 in | 187.8 in |
| Width | 69.7 in | 72.5 in |
| Height | 63.2 in | 66.3 in |
| Curb Weight | 3,500 lb. | 4,101 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.9 gal. | 18.8 gal. |
| Row 1 Headroom | 40.5 in | 40.9 in |
| Row 1 Shoulder Room | 54.4 in | 55.8 in |
| Row 1 Hip Room | 51.0 in | 51.1 in |
| Row 1 Legroom | 44.1 in | 41.2 in |
| Row 2 Headroom | 39.1 in | 39.2 in |
| Row 2 Shoulder Room | 53.7 in | 55.3 in |
| Row 2 Hip Room | 52.6 in | 51.3 in |
| Row 2 Legroom | 33.9 in | 39.9 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 33.5 ft3 | 31.5 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 66.2 ft3 | 63.7 ft3 |
Option Package Details
2.5 XT
| Limited Package | ||
| Feature | Value | Requested? |
| Leather seating surfaces | 900 | Yes |
| Power recline, passenger | 100 | No |
| Power fore-aft, passenger | 100 | No |
| Manual lumbar, passenger | 50 | No |
| Center armrest(s) | 50 | Yes |
| Sunroof, large | 1200 | No |
| Total Requested | 950 | 40% |
| Total Not Requested | 1450 | 60% |
Option Package Details
LT
| Class II trailer hitch | ||
| Feature | Value | Requested? |
| Class II trailer hitch | 200 | Yes |
| Trailering equipment (4 wire) | 125 | Yes |
| Total Requested | 325 | 100% |
| Total Not Requested | 0 | 0% |
| 2LT Equipment Group | ||
| Feature | Value | Requested? |
| Automatic climate control, front | 200 | Yes |
| Heated front seats | 300 | Yes |
| Auto-dimming rearview mirror | 150 | Yes |
| Fog lights | 125 | Yes |
| Power fore-aft adjuster, driver seat | 100 | Yes |
| Power tilt adjuster, driver seat | 100 | Yes |
| Power recliner, driver seat | 100 | Yes |
| Remote start | 150 | No |
| Pioneer, 250W, 8 speakers (with subwoofer) | 350 | No |
| Total Requested | 1075 | 68% |
| Total Not Requested | 500 | 32% |
| 3.0L V6 DOHC-4v 264 hp@6950 222 lb-ft@5100 | ||
| Feature | Value | Requested? |
| 3.0L V6 DOHC-4v 264 hp@6950 222 lb-ft@5100 | 1000 | Yes |
| Bright-finished exhaust tip(s) | 50 | No |
| Total Requested | 1000 | 95% |
| Total Not Requested | 50 | 5% |
Option Package Details
LTZ
| Class II trailer hitch | ||
| Feature | Value | Requested? |
| Class II trailer hitch | 200 | Yes |
| Trailering equipment (4 wire) | 125 | Yes |
| Total Requested | 325 | 100% |
| Total Not Requested | 0 | 0% |
| 3.0L V6 DOHC-4v 264 hp@6950 222 lb-ft@5100 | ||
| Feature | Value | Requested? |
| 3.0L V6 DOHC-4v 264 hp@6950 222 lb-ft@5100 | 1000 | Yes |
| Bright-finished exhaust tip(s) | 50 | No |
| Total Requested | 1000 | 95% |
| Total Not Requested | 50 | 5% |
Dealer Price Quotes
|
Want to find out how much dealers are willing to discount these cars? Request free, no-obligation Subaru Outback dealer quotes or Chevrolet Equinox dealer quotes from dealers using our car quote form. You can also request quotes from our partner PriceQuotes.com in the sidebar and motivate dealers to compete for your business by offering the lowest possible price. The process is easy and takes just a minute or two. You'll receive price quotes from local approved dealers within 48 hours. |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Price of the Subaru Outback
| Price of the Subaru Outback: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Wagon 256-horsepower 3.6L H6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Compared to Many of the same type autos You get alot for the Money.Many competitors have the options but everything seems ala cart |
| 2010 | 4dr Wagon 256-horsepower 3.6L H6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Price new was $33K; about the same as every other car we considered, including the LR2, C300, XC70. |
| 2006 | 4dr Wagon 175-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Got a great deal on a used 2006/ |
| 2005 | 4dr Wagon 168-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
6 year plan @ 2.9% |
| Price of the Subaru Outback: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Wagon 170-horsepower 2.5L H4 6-speed shiftable CVT AWD |
Very expensive. |
| 2009 | 4dr Wagon 170-horsepower 2.5L H4 5-speed manual AWD |
During Cash for Clunkers Subarus had limited incentives compared to other vehicles normally selling at a higher price point and with more content. |
| 2007 | 4dr Sedan 245-horsepower 3.0L H6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
$33,000 starting price. For what amounts to a nice station wagon. |
| 2007 | 4dr Wagon 245-horsepower 3.0L H6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Very high resale values and popularity make the car very popular for resales. Unfortunately the vehicle has a higher sticker price. This is easily offset in the long run on reliability. |
| 2005 | 4dr Wagon turbocharged 250hp 2.5L H4 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Damn, it was expensive (one year old and cost $24K, original price something like $32.5K) but you get what you pay for I think. |
| 2003 | 4dr Wagon 212-horsepower 3.0L H6 4-speed automatic AWD |
High price for its class |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Price of the Chevrolet Equinox
| Price of the Chevrolet Equinox: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 185-horsepower 3.4L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
It was affordable at the time. |
| 2005 | 4dr SUV 185-horsepower 3.4L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
0% for 60 months with many other incentives. |
| Price of the Chevrolet Equinox: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 182-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Except for GM supplier pricing, no budging on price. Much more expensive compared to Escape |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 182-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Price with our desired features was higher than same features in Terrain. |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 182-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
No discounts available, since the car is very popular. |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 182-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Equinox had a comparible price range, but there financing was not as attractive as Ford |
