Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class vs. Toyota Tundra Reliability Comparisons
You won't find Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class or Toyota Tundra reliability information like this anywhere else. Actual repair frequencies, not just vague dots, to make it clear how much the Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class and the Toyota Tundra truly differ in reliability. These stats are promptly updated four times a year, to much more closely track Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class and Toyota Tundra reliability as the cars age. Others tell you how reliable the Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class and the Toyota Tundra were a year ago, when the cars were a year younger and had 12,000 fewer miles on them. Only TrueDelta tells you how reliable the Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class and the Toyota Tundra have been recently.
See Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class vs. Toyota Tundra price comparisonSee what people are saying about Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class reliability
More about the
Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class
More about the
Toyota Tundra
Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class Reliability through December 31, 2012
An asterisk (*) marks results based on small sample sizes.
General NotesModels and statistics marked with an asterisk (*) have very low sample sizes. These results, visible only to logged-in members, provide only a rough estimate of car reliability.Any result under 20 repair trips per 100 cars is likely a result of the small sample size, and should be expected to increase to 20 or so in future updates.
New models often start out with high repair rates, and then improve as the manufacturer identifies and addresses common problems. MethodologyOnly successfully completed repairs are currently included in the analysis. Routine maintenance, most wear items, recalls, and problems fixed with just a reflash or warning light reset are not included.
| Year | Make/Model | Repair Frequencysuccessful repair trips per 100 cars per year | Compared to all models for the same year | |
| 2010 | Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class | 31 GLK-Classes, 9.6 months of data per GLK-Class, average 32000 miles 73 |
Fewest Trips
Most Trips
|
see reported repairs |
| 2011 | Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class | 18 GLK-Classes, 9.3 months of data per GLK-Class, average 14500 miles Small sample size. Join or 18 GLK-Classes, 9.3 months of data per GLK-Class, average 14500 miles Small sample size. sign in to view |
see reported repairs |
Toyota Tundra Reliability Results through December 31, 2012
An asterisk (*) marks results based on small sample sizes.
What People Are Saying about Reliability and the Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class
blog comments powered by DisqusWhat Our Members Are Saying about Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class Reliability and Durability
| Reliability and Durability of the Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Our previous vehicle was a 2005 Mercedes Benz C-240. From a reliability standpoint, the C-240 was flawless. I am hoping the GLK will be as good as the C-240 was. |
What Our Members Are Saying about Toyota Tundra Reliability and Durability
None of our members have yet commented on the reliability and durability of the Toyota Tundra.
