Mazda MX-5 Miata vs. Ford Explorer Sport Trac Reliability Comparisons
You won't find Mazda MX-5 Miata or Ford Explorer Sport Trac reliability information like this anywhere else. Actual repair frequencies, not just vague dots, to make it clear how much the Mazda MX-5 Miata and the Ford Explorer Sport Trac truly differ in reliability. These stats are promptly updated four times a year, to much more closely track Mazda MX-5 Miata and Ford Explorer Sport Trac reliability as the cars age. Others tell you how reliable the Mazda MX-5 Miata and the Ford Explorer Sport Trac were a year ago, when the cars were a year younger and had 12,000 fewer miles on them. Only TrueDelta tells you how reliable the Mazda MX-5 Miata and the Ford Explorer Sport Trac have been recently.
See Mazda MX-5 Miata vs. Ford Explorer Sport Trac price comparisonSee what people are saying about Mazda MX-5 Miata reliability
More about the
Mazda MX-5 Miata
More about the
Ford Explorer Sport Trac
Take the TrueDelta survey on your car and get free access to all of the data on this page. Click here to get started!
Mazda MX-5 Miata Reliability through March 31, 2013
An asterisk (*) marks results based on small sample sizes.
General NotesModels and statistics marked with an asterisk (*) have very low sample sizes. These results, visible only to logged-in members, provide only a rough estimate of car reliability.Any result under 20 repair trips per 100 cars is likely a result of the small sample size, and should be expected to increase to 20 or so in future updates.
New models often start out with high repair rates, and then improve as the manufacturer identifies and addresses common problems. MethodologyOnly successfully completed repairs are currently included in the analysis. Routine maintenance, most wear items, recalls, and problems fixed with just a reflash or warning light reset are not included.
What People Are Saying about Reliability and the Mazda MX-5 Miata
blog comments powered by DisqusWhat Our Members Are Saying about Mazda MX-5 Miata Reliability and Durability
| Reliability and Durability of the Mazda MX-5 Miata: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 2dr Convertible 167-horsepower 2.0L I4 5-speed manual RWD |
Good reliability history according to all research. |
| 2008 | 2dr Convertible 158-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
I only have about 15,000 miles so far. This car does not get driven in the winter because of road salt. Nothing has broken or needed repair yet. |
| 2007 | 2dr Convertible 166-horsepower 2.0L I4 5-speed manual RWD |
Knock on wood - the Miata has proven totally reliable so far. The maintenance bills are very low, and the Mazda dealer service is good. |
| 2006 | 2dr Convertible 170-horsepower 2.0L I4 5-speed manual RWD |
Has been 100% reliable over 6 years, 30,000 miles and two 2 month cross country trips. |
| 2006 | 2dr Convertible 170-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
I haven ot had ANY problems with it. The car only goes to the mechanic for scheduled maintenance - what mroe can one say. |
| 2006 | 2dr Convertible 170-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
Car had a major issue with its engine computer, fixed under warrantee. Other than that, no real issues. |
| 2006 | 2dr Convertible 170-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
Flawless/bullet-proof drivetrain. Few gizmos and needless luxuries = fewer things to break. No need for repairs in 32k miles. |
| 2006 | 2dr Convertible 170-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
its a mazda, it may be said to be too reliable, is there such a thing, this is my second masda mx-5, i ran my first one for 6 years, not one trip to the mazda garage |
| 2006 | 2dr Convertible 170-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
I bought this car at about 40,000km and so far after 8,000km it has olny cost me gas, and 1 oil change that I will need to do this week. |
| 2006 | 2dr Convertible 170-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
Mazda has closed the gap on Honda and Toyota. It hardly gets better than that. That plus the warranty and I have no worries. |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible turbocharged 178hp 1.8L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
Never have had a single issue in the last 30,000 miles that I have put on the car in the last 8 months. |
| 2004 | 2dr Convertible turbocharged 178hp 1.8L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
Bulletproof reliability reputation with very few issues over the life of the car. Miatas with 200,000 miles on them are not uncommon. |
| 2003 | 2dr Convertible 142-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed manual RWD |
Except for a faulty engine part when it was brand new, I have never had to take this car into the dealership for service. 55,000 miles and I still love to drive it. |
| 2003 | 2dr Convertible 142-horsepower 1.8L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
Have had two (1996 and 2003) and have never had either one in the shop. |
| 2003 | 2dr Convertible 142-horsepower 1.8L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
Very low level of reported issues amongst my Miata driving peers. The engine is rock solid, and fairly simple to do relatively elementary work on yourself. |
| 2002 | 2dr Convertible 142-horsepower 1.8L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
I am now retired and have owned several brands of sports vehicles. I knew that the MX-5 would have the lowest maintenance costs. |
| 2001 | 2dr Convertible 142-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed manual RWD |
Among the most reliable series (certainly the first two) of mass-produced autos. Exceptionally reliable for convertibles. |
| 2000 | 2dr Convertible 140-horsepower 1.8L I4 5-speed manual RWD |
The car can go forever. Excellent quality, reliable, well built. |
What Our Members Are Saying about Ford Explorer Sport Trac Reliability and Durability
None of our members have yet commented on the reliability and durability of the Ford Explorer Sport Trac.
