Mazda CX-9 vs. Honda Element Reliability Comparisons
You won't find Mazda CX-9 or Honda Element reliability information like this anywhere else. Actual repair frequencies, not just vague dots, to make it clear how much the Mazda CX-9 and the Honda Element truly differ in reliability. These stats are promptly updated four times a year, to much more closely track Mazda CX-9 and Honda Element reliability as the cars age. Others tell you how reliable the Mazda CX-9 and the Honda Element were a year ago, when the cars were a year younger and had 12,000 fewer miles on them. Only TrueDelta tells you how reliable the Mazda CX-9 and the Honda Element have been recently.
See Mazda CX-9 vs. Honda Element price comparisonSee what people are saying about Mazda CX-9 reliability
More about the
Mazda CX-9
More about the
Honda Element
Take the TrueDelta survey on your car and get free access to all of the data on this page. Click here to get started!
Mazda CX-9 Reliability through December 31, 2012
An asterisk (*) marks results based on small sample sizes.
General NotesModels and statistics marked with an asterisk (*) have very low sample sizes. These results, visible only to logged-in members, provide only a rough estimate of car reliability.Any result under 20 repair trips per 100 cars is likely a result of the small sample size, and should be expected to increase to 20 or so in future updates.
New models often start out with high repair rates, and then improve as the manufacturer identifies and addresses common problems. MethodologyOnly successfully completed repairs are currently included in the analysis. Routine maintenance, most wear items, recalls, and problems fixed with just a reflash or warning light reset are not included.
Honda Element Reliability Results through December 31, 2012
An asterisk (*) marks results based on small sample sizes.
What People Are Saying about Reliability and the Mazda CX-9
blog comments powered by DisqusWhat Our Members Are Saying about Mazda CX-9 Reliability and Durability
| Reliability and Durability of the Mazda CX-9: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The CX-9 has continued our experience of flawless Mazda reliability. We expect to have this car for the next 10 years. |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Seems solid |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
no problems up to this point |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Highly rated in Consumer Reports |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
so far had the cx-9 for a year with not major issues |
| Reliability and Durability of the Mazda CX-9: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Not familar with Mazda so I was unsure |
What Our Members Are Saying about Honda Element Reliability and Durability
None of our members have yet commented on the reliability and durability of the Honda Element.
