Cadillac CTS vs. Cadillac SRX Reliability Comparisons
You won't find Cadillac CTS or Cadillac SRX reliability information like this anywhere else. Actual repair frequencies, not just vague dots, to make it clear how much the Cadillac CTS and the Cadillac SRX truly differ in reliability. These stats are promptly updated four times a year, to much more closely track Cadillac CTS and Cadillac SRX reliability as the cars age. Others tell you how reliable the Cadillac CTS and the Cadillac SRX were a year ago, when the cars were a year younger and had 12,000 fewer miles on them. Only TrueDelta tells you how reliable the Cadillac CTS and the Cadillac SRX have been recently.
See Cadillac CTS vs. Cadillac SRX price comparisonSee what people are saying about Cadillac CTS reliability
More about the
Cadillac CTS
More about the
Cadillac SRX
Take the TrueDelta survey on your car and get free access to all of the data on this page. Click here to get started!
Cadillac CTS Reliability through March 31, 2013
An asterisk (*) marks results based on small sample sizes.
General NotesModels and statistics marked with an asterisk (*) have very low sample sizes. These results, visible only to logged-in members, provide only a rough estimate of car reliability.Any result under 20 repair trips per 100 cars is likely a result of the small sample size, and should be expected to increase to 20 or so in future updates.
New models often start out with high repair rates, and then improve as the manufacturer identifies and addresses common problems. MethodologyOnly successfully completed repairs are currently included in the analysis. Routine maintenance, most wear items, recalls, and problems fixed with just a reflash or warning light reset are not included.
What People Are Saying about Reliability and the Cadillac CTS
blog comments powered by DisqusWhat Our Members Are Saying about Cadillac CTS Reliability and Durability
| Reliability and Durability of the Cadillac CTS: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2004 | 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
Needed very little in the first 40k other then just oil and filters. |
| 2004 | 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
Better than the germans. |
| 2003 | 4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
This car has been very reliable. I have never had any problems with it - none at all. It is still even on its original brake pads and rotors! Cadillac builds quality and reliability. |
| Reliability and Durability of the Cadillac CTS: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Replaced water pump, rt front strut and upper strut mount at 24,000 miles. Car always idled rough. |
| 2004 | 4dr Sedan 400-horsepower 5.7L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Rear end failures started popping up early on this model. I knew it when I bought it, so I nver do hard launches off the line. You are a begging for a blown rear end if you do. FACT: GM knowingly under-engineered the materials for the torque output. |
| 2003 | 4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
Look up any CTS owner sites and you will see a large amount of problems for every uear of this car.The name Cadillac does not indicate aquality car today. |
What Our Members Are Saying about Cadillac SRX Reliability and Durability
None of our members have yet commented on the reliability and durability of the Cadillac SRX.
